Redefining National Priorities: Trump’s Executive Actions on Climate and Energy

By: Nihara E. ‘27

At the beginning of President Trump’s second term, a series of executive orders has once again become a main focus of the public. These directives, covering a range of issues from environmental regulations to social policies, mark a significant shift in the nation’s direction. While some represent substantial expansions of executive authority, others serve primarily as symbolic features. Given their potential impact, it is important to break down how these actions could influence society. Among the many orders recently issued, two will impact United States climate and energy policy, with the potential to bring about profound changes in the United States' role in the global environmental moment.

One of the most significant actions has been President Trump’s decision to withdraw the United States from the Paris Agreement. This decision aims to shift away from global climate action, prioritizing American economic interests over international environmental commitments. The U.S. effectively distances itself from the collective effort to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and combat climate change. Trump himself stated that he was “Immediately withdrawing from the unfair, one-sided Paris climate accord rip-off,” emphasizing his view that the agreement imposes unfair burdens on the American economy. The impacts of this withdrawal will undeniably have larger consequences, as it undermines the U.S. credibility on the world stage and creates an imbalance in global climate diplomacy. Other nations such as China could take advantage of this situation, positioning themselves as leaders in the green energy transition. It is also important to note that this decision has been met with harsh criticism from environmental groups, scientists, and Democratic officials, who argue that it will worsen the climate crisis and harm American workers. The withdrawal also prevents U.S. contributions to international climate finance, depriving developing nations of critical resources for mitigating and adapting to climate change.

Another nationally consequential executive order is the temporary halt to all offshore wind energy leasing within the Outer Continental Shelf (OCS). This decision reflects a greater effort to prioritize traditional energy sources, such as oil and gas, over renewable energy development. The order directs federal agencies to pause issuing new or renewed approvals, permits, leases, or loans for wind projects, pending a full review of existing federal leasing and permitting practices. This pause on offshore wind development has caused distress throughout the renewable energy industry, potentially jeopardizing planned projects and investments. The administration justifies this action by mentioning concerns related to marine life, ocean currents, wind patterns, energy costs, and the fishing industry. This order reflects a broader skepticism towards wind energy, with President Trump often expressing his dislike for “Big ugly windmills” that “Ruin your neighborhood.” However, many argue that this decision could affect the growth of promising clean energy sources and weaken efforts to combat climate change.

President Trump’s executive orders on climate policy and energy development underscore a massive shift in national priorities, favoring economic interests over protecting the environment. The withdrawal from the Paris Agreement distances the United States from international climate efforts, while the offshore wind energy moratorium slows the progress of renewable energy development. As the policies take effect, their long-term consequence on the environment, economy, and international relations will continue to shape the nation’s future.